First roll impressions: CineStill 400Dynamic

Indiana State Fair 2023

You’ll seldom find me where the cool kids are. I’m too independent and too suspicious of popular trends. All the cool kids are shooting the new CineStill 400Dynamic film these days. Yet when I was in Central Camera the last time I was in Chicago, even I succumbed to temptation and bought a couple rolls of this film.

CineStill 400D is said to offer natural colors, a warm bias, and rich skin tones. It’s rated at ISO 400, but CineStill promises excellent performance from EI 200 to 800, and pushability all the way to 3200.

My older son took me to the Indiana State Fair for my birthday in August, so I got out my Olympus OM-2n, mounted the excellent 50mm f/3.5 Zuiko Auto Macro lens, and loaded my first roll of 400D. I set the camera to 400 — it’s always a good idea to shoot a new-to-you film at box speed the first time.

Indiana State Fair 2023

It was a hot day at the Fair, and except for a few clouds the sun was bright and direct. The 400D didn’t render the blue of the sky very strongly.

Indiana State Fair 2023

But all other color came back true and well saturated. Notice on this photo the strong glow of the fluorescent lights that peek through a couple of the umbrellas. 400D is known for this halation effect.

Indiana State Fair 2023

I am super pleased with how 400D captured the color of this merry-go-round beast. He looks better on film than he did in person!

Indiana State Fair 2023

My experience with 400D is that it loves yellows and oranges, making them look bolder than anything around them.

Indiana State Fair 2023

I am not as impressed with how 400D renders neutral and earth tones. The colors just kind of lie there.

Indiana State Fair 2023

Here’s my son at one of the games of chance. In real life, his shirt is a cool gray. 400D warmed it up and turned it slightly blue. When I corrected this image in Photoshop so his shirt looked right, all of the other colors were wrong.

Indiana State Fair 2023

I always like to test new-to-me color films on black subjects. 400D renders a true, rich black.

Indiana State Fair 2023

This just might be the image that pleases me most from the roll, from a straight-up color perspective. The green of this tractor’s snout is so rich.

Indiana State Fair 2023

There’s a lot going on in this photo but the colors all pop.

Indiana State Fair 2023

I especially like how 400D renders pastels — restrained but vibrant.

Indiana State Fair 2023

A sudden downpour sent fairgoers scrambling for shelter. Just as quickly the rain passed and the sky returned to partly cloudy.

Indiana State Fair 2023

I like this film all right. I don’t like it any more or less than the other ISO 400 color-negative films from Fujifilm and Kodak that I can get more easily. However, even given the scandalous price of color-negative film these days, $15.99 for a single roll of CineStill 400Dynamic is awfully high.

Get more of my photography in your inbox or reader! Click here to subscribe.


Comments

15 responses to “First roll impressions: CineStill 400Dynamic”

  1. JR Smith Avatar

    Impressive results! I still have one more roll of this stuff in the refrigerator…standing by for fall colors.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      That’s a good idea! I may have to copy it.

  2. Peter Miller Avatar
    Peter Miller

    The first shot at the merry-go-round is great.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      Thank you!

  3. Andy Umbo Avatar
    Andy Umbo

    You know, as a pro, always been a transparency shooter, but I have to say over the years, as I’ve shot color neg here and there, it always seems to me that “high speed” film, like 400 and above, always seems to have a contrasty look that slower speed films don’t have. I don’t really know how to describe it anymore in this day and age, more juiced? These are a good example of this. They certainly are fully detailed and colorful, but if you shot a roll of 64 or 100 on the same subjects, they would look different and not just in grain. Smoother? Subtler? I don’t quite know, but it’s kept me away from the high speed negative films. The greatness of Kodak 200 is that it looks exactly like Kodak 100, but not like 400.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      Oh man, if only one could still get the ISO 100 color films from Kodak and Fuji. They were great.

      1. adventurepdx Avatar

        They still make Fujicolor 100 for the Japanese market. Well, at least they used to: When I was in Japan in spring, Fuji made the announcement that they were suspending domestic production for a bit. That elicited a “no duh” from me, because I searched numerous camera shops and only found one that had any Fuji 100 stock, so I bought up a bunch. Freestyle in LA and Shot on Film in Seattle would intermittently stock Fuji 100 but it was never cheap. I heard that Fuji lifted the suspension, so we’ll see if means more Fuji 100.

        As for Kodak 100, there is Pro Image, which is cheaper than Ektar. Many places have gotten them restocked, like Blue Moon. Have you given it a shot yet?

        1. Jim Grey Avatar

          Fuji 100 is wonderful. I’ve bought a few rolls from Freestyle in the past. I’ve not tried ProImage yet. I’ve stocked up on Fuji 200 and 400 and have plenty of that to shoot through before I go buying any more color film!

        2. Kodachromeguy Avatar

          I loved Kodak’s Gold 100 in the past. Prints were usually spot on, and recently, It scans easily and without any issues or weird colors. I bought a 4-pack from a seller who claimed it had been in a cool basement. Roll 1 was fine. But it’s a gamble with any expired color film. The current Kodak Portra160 film looks similar to me, so that will be my future stock. But maybe I’ll also look for the 100 Fuji.

  4. Darts and Letters Avatar
    Darts and Letters

    “……it’s always a good idea to shoot a new-to-you film at box speed the first time.” Jim, is this in any way related to the idea of “pulling or pushing” film? Sorry if this seems like a childish question, I just started shooting film from scratch, a couple weeks ago. (maybe strike my question, I just went back and reread the paragraph before the above quote)

    Personally, I love the rendition of color in all these pictures (your qualms duly noted), that’s probably in-line with the fact I naturally prefer warmer WBs for pictures from my dslr. I think I might try a roll of this for autumn shooting, when colors are nice but we’re having really gloomy days. Particularly the 800.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      Yes, my comment was about shooting film at something other than its rated speed. This particular film is said to work well from 200 to 800 without the need to push or pull processing. For example, when I shoot Ilford HP5+, an ISO 400 film, at EI 1600, I have to extend processing time to compensate. That’s called “pushing development.” I don’t develop my own color, and the processor charges more for push or pull processing, so it’s good to know I should get great results along that wide exposure range! On the other hand, most consumer color negative films look good at as much as -3 stops and +2 stops without the need to alter processing.

      1. Darts and Letters Avatar
        Darts and Letters

        So when you turned this film in, you didn’t choose to specify having the processor push/pull one way or the other? Do you ever do that?

        1. Jim Grey Avatar

          I didn’t need to because I shot this film within its exposure latitude. I shoot Fujicolor 200 at 100 all the time and just have it processed normally.

          I’ve never specified push or pull processing with the lab. I know some people do it. I just have never wanted to try it.

  5. J P Avatar

    Forget the film – now I’m hungry for a sausage sandwich and a corn dog!

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      There’s gotta be a fair somwhere, where you can get one!

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: