single frame: Mourning dove in our flower box

Mourning dove in our flower box

Mourning dove in our flower box
Nikon Df, 70.0-300.0mm f/4.0-5.6G AF Nikkor

The flower boxes on the deck railing looked terrible as spring began, as last year’s dead annuals were still in them. But then one plant in particular came back in each box anyway.

We were surprised and amused one morning to find a mourning dove sitting in the middle of that plant in the middle box. When she was still there when we came home from work, we figured she was nesting.

She was. We inadvertently frightened her off one morning, so we went out to find two little eggs where her body had parted the plant.

She sat vigilantly for days and days. Weeks. Might have been a month; I wasn’t paying enough attention to time. But then one evening we noticed a second mourning dove perched on the box’s edge. Mama bird shortly flew off, and the other bird — we assume it was papa — made his way onto the nest.

Margaret researched mourning doves and learned that they are monogomous and cooperate in the incubating and raising of their young. Sure enough, when the eggs hatched both mom and dad were involved in care and feeding. One afternoon we were fortunate to watch the hatchlings greedily eating from one of their parents’ mouth.

Margaret also learned that mourning doves can have as many as six broods in a season. They are prolific, but they are also frequent prey. They have to reproduce frequently to keep from dying off!

After the first brood flew the nest, we had a few days without our birds and we thought we were done. But then we found one of the young from the original brood (we think) on the nest! This is when things started getting confusing. We also saw the original mama and papa on the nest. There must be more eggs. But is raising young truly a multi-generation affair?

If you’d like to get more of my photography in your inbox or reader, click here to subscribe.


10 responses to “single frame: Mourning dove in our flower box”

  1. Greg Clawson Avatar
    Greg Clawson

    Cool photo Jim! My wife and I feed the birds, but I don’t have much luck photographing them. Maybe I “need” a Nikon 600mm f4 lens, oh $12k Plus, probably not.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      A lens that costs twelve thousand dollars???!?!??!!! yikes.

  2. Kodachromeguy Avatar

    What an adorable little bird. Well done.

    As for Mr. Greg above, he definitely does need that 600mm ƒ/4 lens. Go for it. What are the downsides?

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      I recently made another shot of one of the adult mourning doves feeding two babies. I’ll share that one on here in time.

      I simply cannot imagine spending 12 large on a lens. My car didn’t cost that much!

      1. Greg Clawson Avatar
        Greg Clawson

        Jim, my car didn’t cost $12k either. 🤑

  3. Kurt Ingham Avatar

    So cool! btw many
    of those big bucks lenses are rentals

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      If you use such a lens only occasionally, rental makes a lot of sense.

  4. Jerome Avatar

    Nice shot! This spring we had four families take up residence: 2 sets of house finches, a pair of doves and a pair of robins.

    The doves loved the safflower seeds and would come a sit for long periods after eating before the eggs came. I intended to post images, but woes got in the way.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      Sounds like you’re getting a lot of enjoyment from the birds this season!

  5. Rick Bell Avatar
    Rick Bell

    What beautiful gifts our Creator gave us!

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up for my newsletter!

Sign up for my monthly newsletter,
Back Roads, and be the first to know
what I'm working on!

%d bloggers like this: