A Chinese company called Sunpet has had this little 35mm point-and-shoot camera in its catalog for more than 25 years now. Several companies have slapped their names on it and sold it. The best-known company is Vivitar, who may have been the first to sell it back in the mid-late 1990s. So branded, it became a well-loved, almost cult classic. That’s certainly why so many other companies have sold this camera — they’re trying to cash in. Most recently, the Reto Project in Hong Kong has reissued this camera as the Reto Ultra Wide and Slim.

Reto Ultra Wide and Slim

Reto’s release of this camera created quite a buzz in 2022, especially given its $29 list price. That’s barely more than the cost of one roll of film and processing these days. I’m not normally one to jump on bandwagons, but I bought one of these the moment I could. Fellow photoblogger Mike Connealy does terrific work with his Vivitar Ultra Wide and Slim (see some of it here), and I wanted a piece of that action.

Reto Ultra Wide and Slim

But I’ve buried the lede. What sets this inexpensive, fixed-focus, plastic camera apart is its extremely wide lens: 22mm at f/11. It’s set in a 1/125 second single-blade leaf shutter. The lens has a surprisingly sophisticated design, given this camera’s price, with one acrylic element in front of the shutter and another behind it. Also, baffles inside the camera’s film door forces the film to curve. This combination results in remarkably low-distortion images. The lens delivers some softness and vignetting in the corners, however.

Reto Ultra Wide and Slim

At 3 7/8″ x 2 1/4″ x 1″, the Ultra Wide and Slim is about the same size as the tiny Olympus XA. But the XA is a heavyweight compared to the feather-light Ultra Wide and Slim. This all-plastic, all-mechanical camera weighs just 2½ ounces!

The Reto Ultra Wide and Slim is available in five colors: charcoal, cream, pastel pink, muddy yellow, and murky blue. I went with the murky blue.

I’ve shot a number of point-and-shoot cameras over the years. Check out my reviews of the Canon Snappy 50 (here) and Snappy S (here), the Kodak VR35 K40 (here) and K12 (here), the Nikon Zoom Touch 400 (here), and the Olympus Stylus (here) and Trip 500 (here). Or check out all of my camera reviews here.

My first roll of film in the Ultra Wide and Slim was some expired ISO 200 Ferrania color negative stock with Kroger branding that I picked up cheap. The images showed the grain and color shifts consistent with expired film. But just look at how much of the scene the Ultra Wide and Slim captured!

Down the street

Here’s a look down Main Street in Zionsville. It took me a couple of rolls to start to get the hang of this wide lens, and avoid having so much uninteresting foreground in my images.

Down the brick street

Just look at how straight all the lines are in this straight-on shot.

Blue garage

I kept going with a roll of Fomapan 400. In retrospect, I wish I had chosen HP5 Plus or Tri-X for the huge exposure latitude they offer. Several of the images I made on this film were badly misexposed.

Through the windshield, Downtown Indianapolis

The winder is the cheapest-feeling aspect of this camera. It makes quite a ratchety noise when you use it. On this roll of film I felt it tearing sprocket holes as it wound the first five or so frames.


The film counter is hard to read. It’s not just that the numbers are small and my eyes are more than 50 years old. The plastic magnifying bubble over the numbers does more to distort those numbers than to magnify them. That bubble also reflects light, which further obscures the numbers. Finally, the numbers are printed in a faint red.


My next roll was some fresh Fujicolor 200. Some say that this camera can struggle to wind toward the end of a 36-exposure roll. I did not find that to be the case at all with this 36-exposure roll, or the 36-exposure roll of Fomapan that I shot.

At the food truck

The Ultra Wide and Slim’s viewfinder isn’t accurate — when I framed this yellow Pontiac, the cars on either side of it were barely in the frame. But then, hardly any point-and-shoot viewfinder is accurate. I don’t know why I expect better after all these years. The viewfinder also has a fisheye effect that the lens itself does not.

Yellow Pontiac

This simple image does a great job of showing how sharp this acrylic lens is. Reto recommends using ISO 100 or 200 film on sunny days, and ISO 400 film on cloudy days, to accommodate the camera’s fixed exposure.


Despite the lens’s ultra-wide angle, I still had to tilt the camera to bring some subjects fully into the frame. However, I don’t think I could have managed this image with the 35mm lenses that are common to point-and-shoot cameras. I would have hit the building behind me before I backed up enough.

J. W. Marriott

I had trouble rewinding the first two rolls I shot in this camera. I thought I heard and felt the film leader pass into the cartridge, but when I opened the camera I found a little film was still wound on the takeup spool. A few frames on each roll were ruined because of this. On my third roll, I discovered that the rewind crank had wiggled down a little bit. I pushed it all the way up before I rewound. This time upon rewinding I heard the same steady clicking noise as when I wound the film. When the film came off the takeup spool and was fully in the film canister, the clicking stopped. Aha! So if you rewind this camera but don’t hear that clicking, press the crank/spool firmly back up into the camera.


I am deliberately not showing you the many images I made that featured one or more of my fingers. The lens is so wide that if your fingers are on the front of the camera at all, you are likely to see them in your image. By my third roll I had built a habit of holding the camera only around the edges, to eliminate all chance of getting my finger in the lens.

To see more from this camera, check out my Reto Ultra Wide and Slim gallery.

The Reto Ultra Wide and Slim is a blast to use, especially after you learn how to work around its quirks. It’s the kind of camera you want to keep loaded at all times, and slip into your pocket wherever you go. On a full-sun or cloudy-bright day, load this camera with your favorite everyday color film and be ready for some fun shooting.

If you like old film cameras, check out all of my reviews here!
To get Down the Road in your inbox or feed reader, subscribe here.


17 responses to “Reto Ultra Wide and Slim”

  1. brandib1977 Avatar

    Since you mention it, why can’t they get the viewfinder right on a point and shoot? There must be a better way.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      I don’t get it. Sure seems like more care could be taken in viewfinder design.

      1. brandib1977 Avatar

        After all these years, I’m going out on a limb to say they don’t care.

  2. Kodachromeguy Avatar

    Neat examples. These results look better overall than the ones I got from the 30mm f/10 lens that some Chinese companies remount in a Leica thread mount (ltm) housing. Possibly I have a bad example.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      I gather that those 30mm f/10 lenses are sharp in the center but fall off quickly after that.

  3. -N- Avatar

    Cameras like this are fun to play with and you can get some good shots. The issue with the view finder is one also found with most – if not all – folding cameras. I am still trying to teach myself the logic of framing such cameras, but c’est la vie!

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      Over the weekend I shot a new-to-me old folder that had only a pop-up viewfinder. I haven’t developed the film yet, but I’m already certain that the images I get back won’t match my framing. Maybe it’ll irritate me less because I’m ready for it.

      1. -N- Avatar

        I always find my mind goes – view finder is higher, raise the camera. And then my mind goes, lower the camera. My mind then shuts down and I pray a lot!

  4. Roger Meade Avatar
    Roger Meade

    I just got a yellow version a few days ago and I am looking forward to finding some interesting subjects for that wide lens. I have wanted a very wide lens for a long time now, but was stopped by the big price tags for something that would see only occasional use. The Ultra Wide and Slim may satisfy my needs!

    Thanks for the tip about the finger placement- that photo of the Pontiac shows that the viewfinder is really way too narrow.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      For thirty bucks, it’s hard to go wrong with one of these. And yes, the vf is waaaay too narrow.

  5. Dan Avatar

    I’m glad you’re having a blast with the UWS. Its pocketability, light weight, and the 22mm lens make it a great travel camera and its the first camera I pack whenever I take trip.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      I can see why. It’s so easy to take with you.

  6. Steve Mitchell Avatar

    That thing sure punches above it’s weight!

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      It sure does! I feel like I still haven’t found this camera’s best performance, so I will have to keep shooting with it until I do!

  7. Katie Yang Avatar

    I can’t believe you got away with expired 200 speed film for your first roll! Love those color shifts. Makes me eager to load up my Superheadz UWS!

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      Not only that, but this was the first roll of the stuff I shot, so I didn’t know how it would behave! I don’t know why I do that to myself, but I do, regularly.

  8. […] the RETO Ultra-Wide & Slim; you can check out the reviews by other awesome camera reviewers! Down The Road – RETO Ultra Wide And Slim Austerity Photo – Old Meets New: The Original VUWS and the RETO UWS Emulsive – […]

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.