First published July 17, 2013. It makes me crazy when I hear it said (especially by preachers or others teaching the Christian faith) that when you forgive someone, you must reconcile, returning the relationship to where it was before. It’s not true.

Hibbs Ford Bridge

In my last post I wrote about why and how to forgive – to suffer the loss and bear the pain, to no longer hold anything against the person who harmed you, and to give up your desire to get even. You forgive so you can be at peace.

Reconciliation is a separate step. Where forgiveness is about letting go of the past, reconciliation is about committing to a future – and sometimes it is best for a relationship not to have a future.

Even among people who haven’t harmed us, there are some who are a fit for us and some who aren’t. We routinely choose our intimates, friends, and associates based on any number of factors – shared values, common interests, demonstrations of care and concern for our well-being, and simple appeal. We don’t have to be tight with every person we encounter. We can’t be; there are simply too many people!

God can be tight with everyone; he is perfect and infinite, after all. God’s ideal is forgiveness and reconciliation, and that’s what he offered us at the cross. Jesus’s death gives us both forgiveness from and reconciliation with God, if we accept it as a gift from him. We get to be in relationship with him again, and he will not retaliate against us for our sins. I think God feels deep, deep sadness over every one of us who won’t accept his gift of reconciliation. It is much how we would feel if one of our children thumbed his nose at us and never came home again.

Canadian River Bridge

God wants us to live in peace with everyone, but I don’t think he means for us to keep opening ourselves up to harm. When Jesus preached at the mount, he said something that is frequently misapplied to justify reconciliation with someone who will harm us again and again.

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.”

That’s Matthew 5:38-42, NIV. Jesus was exaggerating a little to make a point; his whole sermon was filled with such hyperbole. Seriously, do you think he means for us to find to a mugger in a blind alley and say, “Here’s my wallet and my phone, and have a nice day?” Jesus himself was struck in the face in John 18:22; he demonstrates his point in John 18:23 where he doesn’t present the other side of his face to his aggressor. He doesn’t hit back or argue, either; he remains peaceable. Jesus is only trying to tell us to let God have vindication and mete out justice.

1880 bridge

I think God wants us to love ourselves enough to choose people who treat us well and build us up.

So when someone harms you, ask yourself:

  • How much did you value the relationship? Highly, moderately, lightly, or not at all? You probably value highly the relationship with a parent, a child, or your best friend of 30 years. You probably place much lower value on the relationship with a distant acquaintance.
  • How much damage was done? Extreme, moderate, or light? For example, someone deliberately burning your house down is far worse than someone casually saying something offensive to you.
  • What does what the other person did say about their character? Was what they did way out of character for them, a one-time deal that is inherently unlikely to be repeated? Or was it consistent with who they are? It’s pretty simple: keep people with good character and shed people with bad character.
  • How well did the other person make amends? Fully, partially or imperfectly, or not at all? When someone harms you or lets you down, trust is damaged. Trust needs to be restored before reconciliation can be complete. Making amends is the first step in restoring trust. Trust builds over time as the other person continues to behave well.
Steel truss bridge, Mill Creek

The answers to these questions help you decide whether to reconcile fully, to end the relationship, or to redefine the relationship.

Let’s look at redefining the relationship for a minute, because it’s not an obvious outcome. It’s when you change the rules of the relationship to protect yourself.

In college, a buddy used to lend me his car sometimes. Once I brought it back with a slightly dented fender. I apologized all over myself. He told me it was all right, and that the little dent didn’t make his old beater look any worse. But he also said that he’d like it if I didn’t ask to borrow his car anymore. He was just as friendly to me after that, but there was this one limit to our relationship. Perhaps in time I could have rebuilt that trust and he might have let me borrow his car again, but college ended for us before that day came.

I once knew a woman with an alcoholic husband. She finally told him that while she loved him and didn’t want to leave him, she couldn’t tolerate his drinking anymore. She told him that when he came home drunk she would kick him out, change the locks, and cancel his debit card, for increasingly longer periods each time. When she let him come back home, she would treat him with love and respect. He eventually got into AA and got sober, but only after being kicked out like this a handful of times, the last time spending many months unwelcome at home.

US 36 Wabash River bridge

Still, there are just going to be times when it’s right to call it quits permanently. Many years ago someone who was supposed to love me hurt me instead, repeatedly, in breathtaking ways. It took me several years to forgive and heal from the abuse, and to be at peace again. There have been no amends made, not even an acknowledgement of what happened. I sometimes encounter that person. I am polite, but I keep interactions short and move on. I think it unwise to let that person be close to me in any way.

I’m thinking again about the college roommate who stiffed me for the $400 phone bill, whose story I told in my last post. He called me trying to apologize. He tried to rebuild my trust by sending me money every couple months towards the debt. Yet I spurned him until the debt was repaid in full. My heart was in the wrong place.

Thankfully, my friend forgave me for that.

To get Down the Road in your inbox or reader six days a week, click here to subscribe!
To get my newsletter with previews of what I’m working on, click here to subscribe!


Comments

15 responses to “Forgiveness isn’t reconciliation”

  1. Greg Clawson Avatar
    Greg Clawson

    Jim, Thank you for being so transparent, these posts are very helpful to me. Your perspective on these issues is refreshing.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      I’m pleased that my posts are resonating with you this week.

  2. Patricia Jeremiah Avatar
    Patricia Jeremiah

    We do not forgive to find peace. We forgive because we have undeservedly been forgiven a much larger debt by God for Christ’s sake. You have to get your own interests out of this picture. It’s not about you. It’s about God.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      God loves his people, and he wants us to be at peace.

  3. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Interesting Jim, I agree with pretty much all of this too. Also, as someone who spent quite a few years in AA meetings I was often surprised at how many men wound up there exactly the way you mentioned. Their wives just calmly explained that they would not be welcomed home unless they stopped drinking. This seemed to be more of a wake up call than tickets, fines, arrests, and even jail time. Sometimes it was too late, and the bond was broken, but surprisingly often, it worked long term, and the marriage was saved.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      I have my own 12-step history and have seen much the same thing in my fellowship.

  4. John Holt Avatar

    Many, many excellent points made here! Thanks for (to me) a kind refresher course.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      Thank you!

  5. J P Avatar

    That area between forgiveness and reconciliation is a tough and confusing one. I think your explanation is as good as any I have seen.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      Thanks my friend. Realizing that forgiveness and reconciliation were separate steps really helped me recover from my first marriage. I might still be stuck without it.

  6. dougd Avatar
    dougd

    Wise words Jim
    These are my favorite type of posts that you do, rare gems indeed

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      Thank you my friend. I do enjoy writing posts like these and it is gratifying when people appreciate them.

  7. Foreign Love Web Avatar

    I like this blog post.

    Just because we forgive, it does not mean that we have to continue or go back to the broken relationships with those people who have harmed us.

    You are right that there are many people in this world. That explains why we grow apart from certain people but grow close to others. Our personalities change as much as our interests, beliefs, etc. do. The same things apply to other people too.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      Spot on! Thanks for stopping by and commenting.

      1. Foreign Love Web Avatar

        Thanks for your reply.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: