Collecting Cameras

Operation Thin the Herd: Progress report

What’s been remarkable about Operation Thin the Herd is the clarity it’s bringing me about what I want my photographic future to be.

That future is SLRs from Pentax and Nikon. They strike that right balance among image quality, usability, and reliability. Also, SLR shooting just suits me.

Canons are usable and mostly reliable, but the images I get from them seldom wow me even though they are technically very good. Minoltas deliver wonderful images and feel great in my hands but I’ve had too much trouble keeping them working. The few SLRs I own from other manufacturers are all fine in their ways, but I know I won’t use them enough to justify keeping them.

Argus A-Four

I’m going to keep a couple medium-format cameras, too, especially one of my Yashica TLRs. Good gracious, but do I love those things. I will also keep a handful of other cameras that I enjoy or that have sentimental value. I’ve already committed to keeping my Olympus XA, for example — it’s a stunning performer and slides right into a side pocket. I’m sure to keep one of my big fixed-lens rangefinders, too; maybe my Yashica Lynx 14e if I can get its meter calbrated. Even though I haven’t shot it yet as part of this project, I’m betting I’ll keep my Argus A-Four, too. Its lens does lovely black-and-white work, and I have a wonderful memory from my high-school days of shooting a roll of Plus-X in one of these and then processing it in the school’s darkroom with a buddy.

I don’t know how far I am through this project but it doesn’t feel like I’ve hit the halfway point yet. Fatigue is starting to set in — I want to just get on with shooting my forever cameras. As a result, I am now more likely to say goodbye to a camera when I do shoot one — or even to sell one on without shooting it again.


17 thoughts on “Operation Thin the Herd: Progress report

  1. So . . . Things are coming into focus?

    As much as I enjoy reading about some of your more unusual cameras, I understand completely how you can be ready to zero in more on that thing that makes you happy.

    • wakka wakka – Keep your day job!

      It made me happy for four decades to just accumulate cameras, but now I really mostly want to make good photographs — and get rid of the boxes of cameras that clutter my bedroom.

  2. The Argus A Four was designed to compete with the Kodak Pony. The Pony had a faster shutter speed and a simpler flash connection. It is also cheaper on Ebay.

    • I own three Ponies (the original, the B, and the C) and this A-Four and it really is a coin toss which one I like most. They’re all functionally similar. For me I think my love of the A-Four is mostly nostalgia, as it was the first semi-decent 35mm camera I ever owned and, back in high school, a roll I shot in one became the first I ever developed myself. I wrote about that some time ago:

  3. I’ve found the process of culling my camera collection cathartic. Like you, Nikon and Pentax have come into favorite positions, although I really like my Minolta XD and Contax RX.

    • I have found it to be bittersweet. I love my gear and it’s sad to part with some of it. I’m about to list a bunch of interesting gear for sale. (If you want any of it, say the word and it’s yours for nothing.)

      On the other hand, I know from experience that I won’t miss any of these cameras after they’re gone. I’ll be too busy and happy shooting my Pentaxes and Nikons!

  4. SilverFox says:

    Good going Jim. I am focusing my efforts on a few cameras now selling/sold some that I just don’t see myself using or don’t look nice enough to keep. The Voigtländer collection stays but anything else is being reviewed.
    With my recent acquisition of a Prominent and a Superb I am happy I have my perfect range of shooters.

  5. bob Dungan says:

    I need to enter another round of herding thinning.

    I tried a couple of Argus a-four’s but never found the love. :)

  6. Dan Cluley says:

    I’ve said it before, but I think the A-four is underrated. It is not in any way a great camera, but a nice example is a pretty good camera, and I think that’s more than most people expect from it’s apearrence.

    • Exactly right. Way better than a box Brownie of any kind. However, this thing was far more expensive than a Brownie, at $32.50 in 1954. That’s like $300 today.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.