Kodak EasyShare C613

Inexpensive cameras were crap during my 1970s kidhood and only slightly better during my 1980s teenagerhood. $25 would buy you a basic new camera, but most of them had limited utility and were cheaply made. By the mid 2000s you could get an entry-level digital camera for about the same money, adjusted for inflation, which works out to about a hundred bucks. And that’s what I paid for this Kodak EasyShare C613 Zoom when I bought it as a gift for my youngest son.

Kodak EasyShare C613

This camera was introduced in 2007, the same year as the iPhone. That first iPhone’s camera couldn’t hold a candle to this Kodak, but as we all know smartphone cameras soon became good, even brilliant in some ways, and put an end to the entry-level digital camera. While there is no substitute for a wafer-thin camera that’s always with you and connects seamlessly to social media, I do regret the loss of Kodak’s digital camera business. You see, no other camera maker renders color as appealing as Kodak. Oh, I know appeal is subjective. Hang in there with me; photos from this camera follow. You’ll see.

Kodak EasyShare C613

On the surface there isn’t much to the C613. You get a few modes, 3x optical zoom, and built-in automatic flash. It’s meant not to confuse the casual snapshooter. That’s definitely what my youngest son was when I bought it for him. But it’s been a reliable performer all these years.

Kodak EasyShare C613

The 6-megapixel C613 packs a 36-108mm f/2.7-4.8 Kodak AF Optical Aspheric lens. (If you’re a Millennial or younger, you’re probably chuckling that this lens is Kodak AF.) Most users probably just left the C613 on Auto, but this camera also offers an image-stabilization mode, a macro mode, and a host of scene modes such as snow, beach, and sports. It also takes 640×480 QuickTime video. If you dig into the menu, you’ll find a surprising amount of control including the ability to set ISO (80, 100, 200, 400, 1250); adjust white balance; choose among multi-pattern, center-weighted, and spot metering; and choose multi- or center-zone autofocus. The C613 stores images on an SD card, but also offers limited built-in storage. Two AA batteries power it.

In 2009 I borrowed this camera from my son for a day. My church had a concert in its parking lot and I was on the crew. I wanted to photograph the event in spare moments, but my comparatively bulky Kodak Z730 wouldn’t fit into any of my pockets. My son’s svelte C613 did, though.

And then wow, did this little camera perform! It delivered excellent sharpness and candylike color. This is Nancy, who organized and hosted the event.

Praise and Music Festival

We rented this stage. The C613’s lens was probably at its widest angle, 36mm equivalent, which added good drama to my easy camera angle.

Praise and Music Festival

In spare moments I pretended to be a concert photographer, even though I’m sure I looked ridiculous with this little plastic camera. This bassist went along with the charade, deliberately posing for me as he casually fingered his instrument.

Praise and Music Festival

That concert was a remarkable experience for reasons that have nothing to do with the C613. I told that story here.

Eight years on my youngest son is preparing to leave for college and I’m preparing to move in with my new wife. These big transitions for both of us made it necessary to clean out his childhood room. We sorted his things into three piles: keepers, things to donate, and things to pitch. He put the C613 onto the donate pile, thanks to a capable camera on his Android phone.

I palmed this little camera and later installed a spare SD card and fresh batteries. I first photographed flowers in my yard in macro mode. But the C613 often struggles to focus in macro mode, especially when the lens is at all zoomed. I frequently had to do a little dance with the C613, repeatedly adjusting framing and pressing the shutter button halfway in hopes the autofocus system could grab onto something. Sometimes it simply wouldn’t. And of course you have no control over depth of field. But when it manages to focus, it does lovely work.

Basket o' flowers

The autofocus system works best on high-contrast subjects, like this yellow flower on a dark green background.


Most of the time I shot the C613 at the wide end of its zoom range simply because that’s where it goes when you turn it on. 36mm is a great focal length for everyday walk-around photography. Or drive-around photography, as is the case in this photograph.


But shooting wide reveals the C613’s fatal flaw: barrel distortion, gobs of it. These two photos are certainly not interesting in and of themselves, but the first shot shows this barrel distortion well. The second shot shows it corrected, which I did easily enough in Photoshop: open the RAW editor, set distortion to 14, set scale to 104%. At 36mm, those settings worked every time.

Window awaiting painting
Window awaiting painting

That distortion goes away more the farther out you zoom. None is evident on this max-zoom (108mm) photo off my deck.

Back yard

I checked the flash’s performance in a few photos. It appears, appropriately, to be optimized for shots across a room in your house, such as of your kid on his birthday. This photo of my Kodak Monitor is about as close as you dare get when using flash. Any closer and the flash washes out the subject and creates a spotlight effect. This post is already too long or I’d show you that flash also did a good job illuminating a shadowy close-up subject against a well-lit background. The C613 sets flash to “auto” every time you turn on the camera and guesses when flash is needed. Sometimes the C613 guesses well, other times not. More than once I shot a scene twice because the C613 thought I needed flash when I really didn’t.


I did take these recent photos into Photoshop to correct distortion, fix little exposure sins, and tweak color to my liking. But every one of the photos I’m sharing here were plenty usable right out of the camera. The concert photos far above had no post-processing and look great.

View through the hosta

This shot of the oak in my front yard is my favorite from my test. Sure, I had to notice this scene and the subtle light play to be able to photograph it. But the C613 captured it well.


You can see more shots from this camera in my Kodak EasyShare C613 Zoom gallery.

The C613 a passable little digicam. It’s not perfect — on top of the barrel distortion and fussy macro-mode autoexposure, the screen washes out entirely in direct sun and its color fidelity is terrible, so you are never sure you got the shot. But compared to any camera of this inflation-adjusted price class forty or even thirty years ago it’s a stunning performer. I would have died and gone to heaven as a kid for a camera this good at this inflation-adjusted price.

If you like old film cameras, check out all of my reviews here!
To get Down the Road in your inbox or feed reader, subscribe here.


14 responses to “Kodak EasyShare C613”

  1. Photography Journal Blog Avatar

    Can I just say I’m a bit surprised this still works? The digital cameras I had from that era just seemed to be more sensitive than the ones I have now and more prone to damage.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      This and my similar-vintage Kodak Z730 both still work. The mode dial on the C613 is starting to not be as sure as it was. That’s the only thing that’s not quite right.

      1. Photography Journal Blog Avatar

        That’s cool, my older two digital cameras both ended up failing when the lens zoom malfunctioned.

  2. Andy Umbo Avatar
    Andy Umbo

    I bought a Canon digital-point-and-shoot about the same time, mostly because it took easily replaceable AA batteries, but I have to say, it never really put anything out this nice! The color was “meh”, but the annoying part was that the camera shot “soft”, not lens soft, but like it didn’t have the sharpening at the right setting, and there were no sharpening settings like a more “pro” camera. I was pretty appalled by the results, for a “Canon”.

    I sent it in a few times, and they said it was “OK”, but I was led to believe by an independent camera repair man that Canon sets their nominal jpegs “soft”, so they can get a “low noise” rating. It was really annoying to have to sharpen everything in a camera editing program, when I was really looking to just have a pocket camera that would just shoot jpegs and everything would be acceptable without me doing anything to them (you know, like shooting real 35mm film and just taking it to the processor!).

    I’m still looking for that 100 dollar camera that does that. I have a pal that has a Nikon credit card sized camera that seems to have very nice output that’s sharp, crisp, punch, and pretty much the “right” color; so maybe I’ll buy that next…

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      My main camera is a Canon PowerShot S95, arguably the finest point-and-shoot digital camera in the world when it was new in 2010. While sharpness isn’t a problem, color is. In auto mode, colors are simply meh.

      I love that camera otherwise. It’s just a powerhouse. I hope mine never dies. I shoot it in Program mode at low ISO most of the time, saving my images as JPG and RAW. I can get so much goodness out of those images in Photoshop’s RAW editor. It’s just remarkable.

      But when I want to just do point-and-shoot snapshots in Auto, the S95 disappoints me because of the muted colors. A camera like this dumb little C613 beats it under most routine snapshot circumstances.

  3. SilverFox Avatar

    It might be interesting to do a comparison between this your canon and a modern camera phone of the same scene to see the colour representation.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      I did do this once: I shot my purple Zippo lighter with the Canon S95 (top) and the iPhone 5 (bottom). Check how the Canon whiffs the purple and the iPhone nails it.


      1. SilverFox Avatar

        Wow that is quite a difference!

        1. Jim Grey Avatar

          A disappointing one. I really wish the S95 did purple better. But I recently learned about the Selective Color layer in Photoshop and it might help me correct muted purples from this camera.

          1. SilverFox Avatar

            I wonder what colour space it uses, maybe you can change it into another one?

        2. Jim Grey Avatar

          I thiiiiiink I tried that once and couldn’t find a color space that improved things at all.

          1. SilverFox Avatar

            oh well, just a thought

  4. Jerry Avatar

    Wrecks? My Eagle Premier died and was buried there in ’98.

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      I bought a side-view mirror for a 1989 Corolla there about 20 years ago. Sure wish I could see that neon lit up.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: