Somebody gave me this box camera, a Kodak Six-20 Brownie with an Art-Deco-inspired faceplate, a few years ago. The timing was bad: I had just decided to swear off 620 film and cameras. I had neither the patience to spool 120 film onto 620 spools, nor the willingness to spend 12 bucks and up for pre-respooled film. But a couple months ago I discovered a pile of eBay Bucks near expiration. And then I found a roll of Verichrome Pan in 620, expired in 1982, that those Bucks paid for. Free film!! So I dug out this old box.

Kodak Six-20 Brownie

Kodak puked out box Brownies by the legion during the first half of the last century. This model was made from 1933 to 1941. Original price: $2.50. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, that’s equivalent to $46 in 2016.

Kodak Six-20 Brownie

As box Brownies go, this one had some unusual features. Almost all the box cameras I’ve known come apart at the back for film loading and unloading. This one comes apart at the front. You pull out the winding knob, pull up on the knob that anchors the carry strap’s front end, and tug on the camera’s face.

The Six-20 Brownie has two apertures, controlled by the tab atop the faceplate. Down selects the larger aperture; use it for most shots. Up selects the smaller aperture; use it for extremely bright conditions such as beach or snow scenes. The camera also offers a single shutter speed plus timed exposures. The tab on the faceplate’s side controls it; pull it out for timed shots. I’m guessing that the shutter operates at somewhere between 1/30 and 1/60 sec., and the two apertures are something like f/8 and f/16.

And while the camera’s lens (a simple meniscus) is inside the box, an external lens focuses the camera for shots at beyond 10 feet. For shots from five to 10 feet, move the lever below the lens opening to move the external lens out of the way. Release the lever and the external lens springs back into place.

By the way, if you like old box cameras also see my reviews of the Kodak No. 2 Brownie, Model D (here) and Model F (here); and the Ansco B-2 Cadet (here) and Shur Shot (here). Or check out all of my camera reviews here.

This camera was filthy when I got it, so I cleaned it up as best I could. The pitted faceplate was beyond help. The viewfinders had gone opaque with crud, so I dismantled them and cleaned them. One of the mirrors was loose, so I superglued it back into place. Then I spooled in the Verichrome Pan.

I don’t know how this Verichrome Pan was stored, but it sure behaved like fresh film. This was the only shot affected by light leak. I wonder if it might have happened while I removed the film from the camera, as I fumbled it a bit and the end of the roll came a little loose for a half second. This was the last photo on the roll.

Mass Ave and a light leak

I don’t know why I persist in using box cameras to photograph distant subjects. They’re meant to take photos of Aunt Martha and the nephews at closer range. When I framed this, the main part of Leon’s filled the viewfinder. But I shot it from across the street. Oh, and by the way, I recently bought a suit from Leon’s. It was a great experience.


I had the Brownie along one day when I took my son to dinner at an outdoor mall in Noblesville. Sharpness and contrast are pretty good here, despite a little haze in the sky around the tree branches.

Parked at the outdoor mall

A couple photos were pretty muddy. I worked them over pretty good in Photoshop to improve contrast. Here’s one of them, of the mural is on the back of the Indianapolis Public Schools administration building Downtown.

IPS mural

This was the muddiest photo of them all, of the three trees on the golf course behind my house. The front ash tree has been dead for at least a year; the bark is starting to fall off. Anyway, Photoshop restored reasonable contrast to this scene. At full scanned resolution, a little motion blur becomes apparent, convicting me of moving the camera slightly as I made this exposure. But at print size, you’d probably never notice it.

Golf course trees

To see more photos from this roll, check out my Kodak Six-20 Brownie gallery.

It’s charming to shoot with simple cameras like this Six-20 Brownie. Even when the results are so-so, it still always pleases me that I got images at all. It’s easy to forget that a light-tight box and the simplest of lenses — even a pinhole — will make an image. And these turned out pretty well. You’d never guess that I used film expired for more than 30 years.

If you like old film cameras, check out all of my reviews here!
To get Down the Road in your inbox or feed reader, subscribe here.


19 responses to “Kodak Six-20 Brownie”

  1. chris smith Avatar
    chris smith

    I agree these really pull you in to the hobby, simple kit but so what …excellent reading :0)

    1. Jim Grey โ˜•๏ธ Avatar

      Thanks! Such fun to get images out of such an old but simple machine.

  2. New England Nomad Avatar

    Very interesting post. I learned a lot!

    1. Jim Grey โ˜•๏ธ Avatar

      Thanks for stopping by!

      1. New England Nomad Avatar

        It’s my pleasure!

  3. Dan Cluley Avatar
    Dan Cluley

    Nice work. I think I like the Noblesville picture the best. It seems to have the best contrast?

    Pretty sure the only prewar Kodak I have used is a folder of some sort. It worked fine, but every other rollfilm camera I have takes square photos, so that just seems more right.

    1. Jim Grey โ˜•๏ธ Avatar

      Yeah, I like the Noblesville shot too.

      I love square photos! But I don’t know of any old box that does them. My Yashica TLRs do, though.

  4. Andy Umbo Avatar
    Andy Umbo

    Nice grouping…buying that book about the quality of box cameras by Mike M. really makes me want to get started finding a few myself…I actually had a ton and tossed out all the ones that were 620, and then ended up selling the rest, so of course, now I want one again…I lust after the last generation Zeiss Box Tengor! 120 film, variable focus, and f/stops; I wish you could by one new.

    1. Jim Grey โ˜•๏ธ Avatar

      Wow, that Zeiss is some box. And why weren’t more boxes set to take 120? They’d all be a lot more usable today.

  5. Bob Dungan Avatar
    Bob Dungan

    Nice photos considering the camera and film used. One of my favorite cameras is a Argus Argoflex Seventy-five. I put a couple of rolls a month through it. The Argus takes much better pictures than you would expect for a single lens, single aperture, single shutter speed camera. Re-rolling 120 film onto 620 spindles is easy and takes only a few minutes.

    1. Jim Grey โ˜•๏ธ Avatar

      I’ve read other positive reviews of the Argoflex Seventy-Five. And they go for reasonable prices on eBay.

      I know, I know, respooling isn’t hard. I don’t know why I resist it so.

  6. bodegabayf2 Avatar

    It’s a testament to the genius of George Eastman that anyone is able to coax an image out of three decades old film. I’ve shot Verichrome from the mid-70s, purchased on e-Bay and stored who knows where or how–and ended up with pretty decent images. Hats off to to you for shooting this very old camera on very expired film!

    1. Jim Grey โ˜•๏ธ Avatar

      Yeah, Verichrome Pan is a remarkably resilient film. I had one not-so-great experience with expired VP but otherwise whenever I shoot it it returns usable images.

  7. kevinallan Avatar

    I’ve only used one roll of 620, but my approach was to clip the edges off a 120 spool with toe-nail clippers and then smooth the edges with sandpaper.

    1. Jim Grey โ˜•๏ธ Avatar

      I have heard of others who do that. I gather that this doesn’t work with some cameras, and with others if you don’t get it just right the spool drags when wound and makes the experience a little unpleasant. I dunno, maybe I’m overthinking it. It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve done that.

  8. Christopher Smith Avatar
    Christopher Smith

    Excellent images Jim from 30 year old film I love using Box cameras as it fun to see what sort of images you get from them. I usually re-spool for my 620 cameras.

    1. Jim Grey โ˜•๏ธ Avatar

      Yeah, maybe I should buy a dark bag and try responding! I have plenty of 620 spools here.

  9. Sam Avatar

    Great results out of that Brownie! I’ve played with them, but never actually shot with one. This piqued my interest! What you wrote about not posting photos of your sons hit a chord with me. I used to post a lot of pics of my kids, but as they get older I find myself less inclined to do so. This puts me in a bit of a dilemma since most of my best shots are of my kids! I hope one day you’ll do the article about that.

    1. Jim Grey ๐Ÿ“ท Avatar

      They’re fun to play with. If you go back to the box, I recommend picking up a No. 2 Brownie (any model letter; I have a Model D) — they take 120 and do solid work for what they are.

      Yeah, I need to write the post about why I don’t share photos of my kids. It’s on my list.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: