Argus A-Four

Let’s get the details out of the way first, because few are available anyway. The Argus Camera Company of Ann Arbor, Michigan produced the Argus A-Four (or, as the camera proudly declares across its face, argus a-four) from 1953 to 1956. The A-Four takes good old 35mm film. Its plastic and aluminum body holds a coated f/3.5 Argus Cintar lens stoppable to f/22. Its three-leaf Gauthier shutter fires only at 1/25, 1/50, 1/100, and 1/200 sec. You have to manually cock the shutter before you can take a photograph. I cocked the shutter before making the photo at right; notice the lever sticking out over the lens barrel.

Argus A-Four

All of the controls are on the lens barrel: aperture, shutter speed, and focus; the shutter-cocking lever; even the shutter button. I’m sure this simple design kept costs down.

Argus A-Four

I had an A-Four in my first camera collection and liked it. I shot a couple rolls with it, and even developed one roll myself and made contact prints (with the help of an experienced friend). It was the first camera I owned that let me set aperture, shutter speed, and focus, and I had absolutely no idea what I was doing. I was fortunate any of those photos turned out. Here’s one of those photos, of the elementary school I attended in South Bend. The film is probably Kodak Plus-X.

James Monroe School

I spooled some color film, probably Kodacolor II, into it for another go. After I set all the settings for him, my brother made this one of me leaning against Dad’s work van.

Me, Van, July, 1982

While I owned maybe a dozen old cameras when I bought that A-Four, I didn’t really think of myself as a collector. Shooting that first roll with the A-Four changed that. I was hooked.

This A-Four competed directly with Kodak’s Pony line, by the way. I’ve reviewed three of them: the Pony 135 (here), the Pony 135 Model B (here), and the Pony 135 Model C (here). You might also check out my reviews of the Kodak 35 (here) and the Kodak Automatic 35F (here). Or check out all of my camera reviews here.

When I restarted my collection I went looking for another A-Four and was happy to come across this one for ten bucks on eBay. When it arrived, I loaded some Fujifilm Neopan 100 Acros, armed myself with the Sunny 16 rule, and started making photographs. This is my neighbor’s front yard with its extensive garden.


My neighbor specializes in hostas. He’s well enough known in hosta circles that a couple times every summer a tour bus pulls up and people get out and wander around his yard.


The A-Four and I went to a giant car auction with more Acros aboard. I was quite a sight with the A-Four and two point-and-shoot digital cameras in my hands. I am simply delighted by this photo of a 1967 Ford LTD headlight.

67 Ford LTD

Here’s a 1972 MGB GT. I’m super impressed with the Cintar lens’s resolving power and the Acros’s tonal range here.


Finally, here’s a photo of a 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle SS 396. I’ve always loved this body style.

1968 Chevy Chevelle SS

On a later outing with the A-Four I loaded some Fujicolor 200 and went out exploring old bridges in the country.

Putnam County bridges

These aren’t bad, but I think I prefer the A-Four with black-and-white film. These colors are just a little off to me. I also got a lot of flare on this outing.

Putnam County bridges

So I returned to black-and-white film the next time I shot the A-Four. This is Arista Premium 400. Faster film was a good choice for a gray day like this one.


I drove up the old Lafayette Road from northwest Indianapolis to Lafayette. The Co-Op building is in Indy, and the Frozen Custard stand is in Lafayette.

Frozen custard

I returned to Fujifilm Neopan 100 Acros for another outing with the A-Four. I’d shifted from Sunny 16 to using a light-meter app on my phone.

Garden toys

The A-Four is a nice companion. I brought it along everywhere with me for a couple weeks while I moved through this roll.

In Faytette

To see more from this camera, check out my Argus A-Four gallery.

You might be surprised to know that I no longer own this A-Four. My outings with it satisfied my nostalgia. But more importantly, I had come to own more cameras than I could store. The A-Four is a fine camera of its type — but the competing Kodak Pony 135, Model C, worked just enough better for me that it was the one I decided to keep.

Don’t let that deter you, however. You can still pick up an Argus A-Four for very little money, have a very nice time with it, and get plenty of lovely images.

If you like old film cameras, check out all of my reviews here!
To get Down the Road in your inbox or feed reader, subscribe here.


45 responses to “Argus A-Four”

  1. Lone Primate Avatar
    Lone Primate

    I admire someone who can get that into film. I wanted to, but I found it so disheartening not knowing till I’d spent $$$ what came out, what looked blurry, and having to spend the money and time waiting… shooting 24 or 36 frames when I wanted to shoot hundreds… when I had that film SLR in the late 80s, it mostly gathered dust. I didn’t have the chops for it; I had to wait for digital to really get started.

    In spite of that, or maybe because of it, I can really appreciate what you’re doing here. Those B&W shots are agreeable and eye-catching (the most satisfying work I ever did with my film SLR was in B&W… unfortunately, it was also the most expensive!). I like that faint blue cast in the photos… is that in the nature of the type of film you were using? That slight suggestion of silver or platinum to them makes them more appealing that something absolutely greyscale in every aspect.

    Sunny 16 rule, huh? Never heard of that. I doubt I’ll be able to make much practical use of it but it’s cool to learn it. :)

    1. Jim Avatar

      You know, LP, I wasn’t any good shooting film until I’d shot digital for several years and learned a little about composition. There’s just no substitute for the instant results you get on a digicam. Now I can frame a shot with a film camera and have an idea that what I’m doing is going to look right — as long as I didn’t bugger up the focus.

      I don’t see the blue cast in my photos. And I don’t really know much about this film; after all, I got it on clearance! I do like how well it renders the chrome on that headlight shot. Honestly, I’m just astonished by the results from this camera.

  2. oncealittlegirl Avatar

    That’s just like the camera my mom used way back when. Nice shots. I’m, for sure, a point and shoot kind of gal.

    1. Jim Avatar

      Thanks for stopping by! Arguses were almost as common as Kodaks back in the day, so it’s not surprising you recognize this camera.

  3. Jen Avatar

    Jim, Amazing photos, as always! Makes me want to get my old point and shoot out.


    1. Jim Avatar

      Thanks Jen!

  4. Veronica Twizzler Avatar

    I typically don’t like old cameras but those photos are amazing! Especially the headlights and tail lights one.

    1. Jim Avatar

      Thanks! It was hard to get a bad shot at the muscle car auction.

  5. Todd Pack Avatar

    I love old cameras. I have a few, but they’re in bad shape. I haven’t even tried to use them. I love the shot of the Ford LTD head light.

    1. Jim Avatar

      Todd, I hope you’ll look into whether your old cameras work and maybe run a roll through a few of them! Well, for cameras for which you can still get film, anyway.

  6. Lulu Avatar

    a nice shot of a flower in a vase. But, right now I am into an advanced camera I can’t afford to buy yet.

    1. Jim Avatar

      One thing I’m learning is that even an inexpensive point-and-shoot camera can take great photos. It’s more about the photographer than the equipment!

      1. Lulu Avatar

        I started to believe that this is right

      2. Richard Avatar


        I believe my 35 mm photos are better than my digital photos “on average” because of two things:

        1) Control. My film cameras give me greater control over focusing and depth of field than the digital cameras I own.
        2) Money. The fact that each photo costs something makes me more thoughtful about composition than my digital photography.

        Make no mistake, I always have a digital camera with me (Canon SD880) but for special times of day or photos, I reach for a film camera also.

        1. Jim Grey Avatar

          Your POV is fairly common, I think. I love my Canon S95 but I tend to take better photos with my film cameras for just these reasons.

  7. mindscreens Avatar

    Your photos of car headlights are great compositions.

    1. Jim Avatar

      Thanks! I tell you, it was hard to get a bad shot at the car auction.

  8. karenstuebing Avatar

    These are wonderful. There is a look to film that can not be duplicated with digital and I don’t care what Photoshop actions or filters you use. That’s a cool little camera too. I’ve still got an old Poloroid and now you’ve inspired me to try to find film for it. :)

    1. Jim Avatar

      Thank you! I enjoy film too. That’s why I included the shot of the ’68 Chevelle, because at its largest size the grain is so nice.

      As for your Polaroid camera, try this site:

  9. srqpix Avatar

    I would love to try out some old film cameras but the cost of it all would be a bit much right now. Maybe one day soon I hope.

    1. Jim Avatar

      It certainly does depend on your finances, but you can pick up good old cameras on eBay for under $30 shipped. The Canon Canonet series are often good choices, or try the Olympus Trip 35. I usually buy my film at Wal-Mart; I can get it that way for $2 a roll. I use for color processing and can get prints and digital files for about $6.

  10. twistedt Avatar

    After careful review I believe that headlight is your best shot. But that’s my opinion. Thanks of the creative images.

    1. Jim Avatar

      Thanks for stopping by!

  11. popscure Avatar

    The Argus is a beauty!
    Also love the close up of the cars. Nice work.

    1. Jim Avatar

      Thank you very much!

  12. florb63 Avatar

    My favorite is the picture of the peonies, but they’re all nice. The Argus is a nice-looking camera; cameras today don’t seem to have the character that the old ones had.

    1. Jim Avatar

      The peonies themselves were mighty nice — they filled my living room with fragrance! Everything seemed to have more character in days gone by.

  13. Songbird Avatar

    Love the pics!!

    1. Jim Avatar

      Thank you!

  14. ldearts Avatar

    great photograpahs they are so beautiful =)
    the headlight photo is my fave
    you are a brill photographer,you have an eye for certain things
    x x x loulou x x x

    1. Jim Avatar

      Thank you! I’m learning as I go. I love that headlight shot and can’t believe I took that photo!

  15. sorrentolens Avatar

    Nice camera and even better photos! Good luck.

    1. Jim Avatar

      Love the teeth in the grille of your avatar.

  16. adria Avatar

    Nice post! Thank you for sharing–I learned with film as well, but have never used an argus a-four. I love the adventure of not knowing what you’re getting. The headlight shot is gorgeous.

    1. Jim Avatar

      Thank you! I shot film for 30 years — badly, I mean frightfully badly — until I got my first digital camera a few years ago. It was the instant feedback (and a little reading about composition) that improved my photos immeasurably! Now I can go back to film and have a half a clue about what I’m doing.

      The headlight shot is composed as I planned but the sunburst was lucky happenstance. The sun came out from behind a cloud just as I clicked the shutter button. I feared it would wipe out the photo, so I shot again at a slightly different angle to avoid the sun. Here’s that shot: But when the photos came back from the processor, the sunlit one was clearly superior.

  17. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jim Grey, Things. Things said: Argus A-Four: Let’s get the details out of the way first, because few are to be found anyway. The Argus A-Four (or… […]

  18. akivsboemi Avatar

    reminding me about my old cameras, who’s in bad shape. all of them…
    but, it’s very very very nice picture!!!!!

    1. Jim Avatar

      I hope you’ll clean one of them up and try to take some pictures with it!

  19. Pat Avatar

    My Dad just recently passed away and one of his possessions is an Argus a-four….which looks to be in decent shape….with the same case as yours, but it’s not broken. I’m trying to sell it and appreciate the good description you gave….and nice photographs too!

    1. Jim Avatar

      Good luck with the sale, and I’m sorry you lost your dad.

  20. Michael Richardson Avatar
    Michael Richardson


    I just inherited an argus a four and would love to get it up and running. Can you email me so we can talk about it?



  21. Tom Wikoff Avatar
    Tom Wikoff

    I recently found your blog while doing research on the Argus a-four. Your photos were fantastic by the way. I recently took possession of an a-four which has been in the family since the mid-50s and was used to take many pictures during both the 50s and 60s some of which I actually still have. The “rediscovery” has me excited and I want to try taking some pictures using the camera (yes, it still works). What kind of film would you recommend? I’m guessing that the ASA of films commonly made at the time this camera was sold was probably in the 25 to 50 range. I doubt there’s any comparable animal out there now. I’d like to try b&w as well as color.
    Thanks, Tom

    1. Jim Avatar

      I have shot exactly three rolls of film in my a-four, two b/w and one color. I like this camera with b/w film (I used Fujifilm Neopan 100 Acros) and not at all with color (Fujicolor 200). The b/w results you see here; the color results all seemed washed out and poorly saturated.

      This camera doesn’t have any sort of exposure system so in a way it doesn’t matter at all what ASA film you use. I shot Sunny 16 with this camera — on a sunny day, f/16 with the shutter speed the inverse of the film speed, and keep stopping down the more cloudy it gets. Or you can get an exposure meter and feed it your film’s ASA/ISO and let it do the rest of the work.

  22. Mark Avatar

    Jim, do you have a routine, General or List, you use when you get a new old film camera?
    Did you do an article?

    I get a camera and want to jump in taking pictures but then think of the film and processing costs, all the possible errors. Then stop, I’m stuck.

    Do you tape the seams or wait to see the results?
    Start with b/w or color or?
    Is there a way to check shutter speed?

    With more people returning to or coming to film the first time might be good article(s)

    1. Jim Grey Avatar

      That is a great idea for an article and I will write it. Here’s my approach in thumbnail:

      You’ve got to let go of fear. You will screw up a lot until you get the hang of it. So especially at first, find the cheapest film/processing/scanning situation you can. For me, that’s color negative film like Fujicolor 200 and processing/scanning at the camera store Downtown. Total cost: about $14. Some films cost $10 or more, some processing/scanning is $20 or more, so you can see how $14 is a pretty good relative deal. You just have to be able to afford the $14.

      I did write some articles about how to check and old camera. This is good to do before you put film in the first time.

      I generally don’t tape up a camera the first time I use it. If I did, I’d never know if it leaked light. If you’re sure the camera basically works, putting film through it is the next test: how well does it work. Light leaks are one of the things you learn about from that test.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: