Camera Reviews

Kodak EasyShare Z730

Kodak EasyShare Z730

This is a love letter to my first digital camera, the Kodak EasyShare Z730.

My road-trip hobby drove this purchase. I was dedicated to film and had been using a wonderful used Olympus Stylus Epic Zoom 80 to document my road trips. The little Stylus came with me every time I hit the road and delivered great results every time. As I started sharing my photos online and building a following, I only wanted to hit the road more and more.

My wallet was feeling the pinch from having all that film developed. I figured that if I bought an entry-level digital camera it would pay for itself within three or four road trips. So I went shopping. Based on Philip Greenspun’s recommendations (at the time) on I settled on the Kodak EasyShare Z730. Not only did Mr. Greenspun have nothing but good things to say about it, but Kodak was selling refurbished units for far, far less than list price. I love a bargain, so I bit.

Kodak EasyShare Z730

I figured I was going to be like the guy who’d owned a succession of beater cars but had just bought his first new car – basic transportation. It wouldn’t be anything special, but it would seem wonderful compared to the discarded ’82 Buick that didn’t always start. After a while, it would show its true colors as an entry-level car.

I was wrong. In all the years this was my primary camera, I enjoyed it very much and made many wonderful photographs with it. That’s not to say it’s a great camera – true to Kodak’s mission, it’s a point-and-shoot for the masses. But for its time (2006), it was highly competent.

Kodak EasyShare Z730

The Z730’s five-megapixel resolution was on the small side even when I bought the camera, but who really makes huge enlargements? What it lacks in resolution, it makes up for in lens; its f/2.8 Schneider-Kreuznach Variogon is very good. It’s also a bit wide, at 33mm, which is good for roadscapes. It offers a 4x optical zoom, to 132mm equivalent. It lacks image stabilization, but shake seems to be a problem only at maximum zoom. I have found that if I back off a hair from max, my photos are crisp.

The Z730 is ready to shoot within a couple seconds of turning it on. The mode-selector dial, which doubles as the on/off switch, is fiddly; I’ve missed a few shots trying to turn the camera on. Its autofocus was fast enough in its day but seems sluggish today, and in low-contrast scenes it struggled to lock. While I’m complaining, I might as well mention that the sun washes out the little 2.2-inch LCD. Fortunately, the Z730 has an optical viewfinder. Also, the battery that came with the camera was good for only about 300 shots, which isn’t enough when I’m on the road. I bought a stouter battery and have shot 700 images in a day with it. Finally, its aperture-priority, shutter-priority, and manual modes are limited. The Z730 is aggressively about pointing and shooting, not about giving control to the photographer.

But I haven’t needed much control to get good results with the family snapshots and roadside landscapes that make up the bulk of my photographs. Under those conditions, the Z730 does a great job nearly all the time.

This photo is of the original alignment of US 36 in Parke County, Indiana. Yes, the original route was a dirt road. I love the vibrant greens in this shot.

Old US 36

The Kodak EasyShare Z730 excels in diffused and indirect light. This covered bridge is also in Putnam County, not far from the road above.

Old US 36

I took this photograph of the Michigan Road (US 421) in Decatur County on a hot and hazy day.

Michigan Road, Decatur County, Indiana

This shot, north of Rochester on the Michigan Road (old US 31), is the abutment from a one-lane truss bridge that used to cross the Tippecanoe River.

One-lane bridge approach

I’ve had a lot of fun shooting wildflowers by the roadside with the Z730’s macro mode. I am so pleased with the detail the lens brings out. However, it’s somewhere between difficult and impossible to control depth of field on the Z730. I just press the macro button and hope for the best.

Roadside chicory flower

At the other extreme, this camera was born to take photos of big brick buildings against the blue sky. This is the Johnson County Courthouse in Franklin.

Franklin, IN

I’ve also been happy with how well the Z730 handles available light. I left the flash off during my entire visit to the 2009 Mecum Original Spring Classic auction at the Indiana State Fairgrounds. To be fair, the joint was bathed in fluorescent light.

1967 Chevy Impala SS

This shot, of the State Theater on State Road 25 in Logansport, does a better job of showing how well the Z730 handles available light.

State Theater, Logansport

The good results I get from my Z730 have encouraged me to learn a little about photography. I always wanted to take better photographs, and because a digital camera shows results instantly, I’ve found it easy to practice. At the muscle car auction, I shot a lot of car details. I learned a lot and got some satisfying results, such as this photo of the hood scoop on a 1970 Dodge Super Bee.

70 Dodge Super Bee

Wandering around Downtown Indianapolis with my camera one afternoon, I was looking for good interplay among the planes of buildings and signs. I especially like how this shot turned out.


Gracie was a frequent road-trip companion until she passed away. I fold down the back seats of my wagon, spread out her blanket, and off we go. She comes along on the leash when I stop to explore, and by the end of the day she’s usually so whipped that she snoozes soundly all the way home. I took this photo as we were heading home after a long day exploring US 50 in Illinois. (Check it out at its full size – you can almost count her hairs.)

Sleepy travel companion

In time I started using newer, more capable digital point-and-shoot cameras, first a Canon PowerShot S80 and then a Canon PowerShot S95. The S95 has become my digital workhorse and I’ve shot countless thousands of photos with it. But it just can’t touch the vibrant, lovely color I get with the Z730. I still get the old Kodak out from time to time, charge up a battery, and take it for a walk.


I almost never used the Z730’s various modes, but here I did try its black-and-white mode.


Many modern digital cameras render purple poorly. Not the Z730.

Purple flowers

When I take the Z730 out today I’m struck by its limitations, the shots it just can’t get. It’s maximum ISO of 400 limits its usefulness in low light. Its autofocus is relatively slow and sometimes just won’t lock. So I make sure to take it out only on the clear, sunny days this camera was born for.


But isn’t it true of every camera, that it is a tool for a particular job? That you have to know when a job calls for that camera?


See more photos from this camera in my Kodak EasyShare Z730 gallery.

The Kodak EasyShare Z730 was a brilliant camera for its time, and still delivers gorgeous images under the right conditions today. Mine introduced me to the possibilities of photography. For that, I’ll always be grateful to it.

If you like old film cameras, check out all of my reviews here!
To get Down the Road in your inbox or feed reader, subscribe here.


15 thoughts on “Kodak EasyShare Z730

    • Thanks, David! Of course, these are the best dozen or so photos of the thousands I’ve taken with this camera — most of my efforts are a lot less pleasing!

  1. Lone Primate says:

    You really HAVE gotten your money’s worth out of that Kodak. :) I shot with Kodak digital cameras for years, from about 1996 to 2006… the first camera I routinely carried around with me was a CX7330. I felt they had an unfortunate tendency to add a purplish-brown cast to images taken in portrait orientation… exactly why, I couldn’t say. I migrated to Canon cameras starting in 2005.

    I can certainly understand why you’d be interested in the D40. I’ve only just gotten back into using my Rebel XT and I’m getting really good results of shooting RAW with it, though it takes time to process the shots. But one thing I can say from personal experience, if it’s going to be an either/or decision, you’ll get a lot more work done with the S90. Your Z730 looks compact, but I’m reasonably sure it’s still not comfortable in your jeans pocket. The S90 is something you can, and probably will, carry with you nearly all the time. The S90’s got a couple of things you’re clearly interested in – a good wide angle (28mm) and it’s a surprisingly fast lens for a compact (f/2), which ought to yield impressive bokeh in close-up shots.

    I replaced my CX7330 with an S80 in May of 2006, and I took 27,000 shots and little clips with it before I sold it to a friend when I moved up to the G9. I don’t know how many shots he’s taken with it, but I know it still works. I eventually even went looking for, and found, a cheap one on eBay just to have around. If you’re not ready to spend $500 or so on the S90, might I put in a word for the S80? You could probably find one for under $200 on eBay, and aside from not being able to shoot RAW, it’s a fantastic little Swiss Army knife of a camera. It’s 28mm and f/2.8 at the wide end, all the controls can be operated with your right thumb, it does AEB spreads so you can do HDR work with it, and has phenomenal macro abilities for a compact. It’s not much wider than a fist and about half as thick, and it’s good on power consumption. I’ve had other cameras that do more, but usually at the cost of being larger and more power-hungry. Ounce for ounce, the S80 might be the best camera I ever owned. It’s certainly the one I’ve taken the most shots with.

    • It will be an either/or decision, and I think you’re right, that tips the scale in favor of the S90.

      But I do have the S80 on a saved eBay search. What keeps me from pulling the trigger is primarily that if I had a couple hundred bucks, it would go to a number of other things first. Once that’s cleared off, we’ll see what happens!

      Yes, the Z730 is NOT a pocketable camera. When I need that, I borrow my son’s Kodak C613. It does a good enough job.

  2. Great shots! I like how much you’ve gotten out of the camera. A good photographer will take good pictures no matter what camera he uses. Of course, a nice camera will both make some shots easier and others possible. Good job with working what you have.

    The S90 looks sweet. I would love to have something I’d carry everywhere. Although the 3MP camera on my Pre is great for reasonably decent spontaneous shots. Most of my twitter pics have been from the Pre’s camera. I’ve even gotten some decent fireworks pictures with it.

    • The best camera is always the one you have with you! I just got film developed from an old Canonet I picked up on eBay and it did a nice job. Anyway, I’ve absolutely gotten my money’s worth out of my Z730.

  3. I’d never even heard of bokeh before your post, though I did know what it was. I assumed you used aperture priority for both those shots? I think the real difference was the background vegetation is clearly farther away in the top one.

    • The aperture- and shutter-priority settings on the Z730 are cumbersome and severely limited, so I just gave up on them. Honestly, all I did for the two flower shots was push the flower/mountain button so that it was in flower mode. Also, those shots are cropped (the only crops in the post) to just one bloom; they came from wider shots. You’re probably right about the distance between the flower and the vegetation affecting the amount of blur, but also available light may have adjusted the aperture wider on the chicory (blue flower) shot.

  4. I’ve had a KZ730 for years now. I researched for a week online before buying it. It was the only digital in its class that had consistent high ratings with virtually no negatives from anyone, professional, or amateur. I haven’t been disappointed. I have several cameras and plan on moving up to a DSLR when I can afford it. I do have the adaptor ring for the telephoto and wide angle (lots of barrel distortion :) ) for the KZ30 with the good retinar lenses. They work great. You can see an example here: and here:

    I spent 200 Euros on mine new, but it was worth it. All my other cameras have cost me under 10 Euros on Ebay though. I’ll probably pay new for my next camera. Especially if it’s DSLR, or it will have to be from someone trustworthy.

    • Rob, I’m glad to hear from another Z730 afficionado! I’m glad you’ve gotten satisfying results from your camera as well.

      You’re right, there is a lot of barrel distortion on your wide lens!

  5. I’ve been looking at these early Kodaks recently, you know how I like on old digital classic! Yours delivers natural yet slightly more saturated colour, just what I like. The b/w image is great too, not all washed out and overly grey, like many digital cameras produce on their b/w mode. Do you still use yours now Jim?

    • I haven’t shot it in 2-3 years. It’s not out of lack of desire, but I just have so many cameras to choose from. One thing that limits it is that it isn’t very good except when there’s full sun. So there are plenty of times I might think to shoot it but the light doesn’t line up.

  6. My first digital was a Kodak DC50. One of the earliest Digitals from Kodak. I later got a Z812 IS and I’ve loved that little camera. Very durable and certainly got my moneys worth out of it for over a decade now.

    • I looked hard at buying one of those Z812s some years ago. It looked like a good fit for my needs. Then I got gifted my Canon S95 and that was that, it’s a stellar camera.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.